Skip to main content

Judge declares Pinochet “fit” to stand trial

The former general, who has been accused of involvement in killings linked to the ‘Condor’ operation, will be kept under house arrest until his trial



Judge Juan Guzman yesterday indicted former General Augusto Pinochet for his involvement in the ‘Condor’ operation, while he had Chile under military rule between 1973 and 1990. The judge also ruled that Pinochet be kept under house arrest. Last night the former dictator’s defence lawyer was planning to lodge an appeal for legal protection with the Supreme Court.

The judge has indicted Pinochet on charges connected with ordering nine “permanent kidnappings” (disappearances) and one killing as part of the kidnappings and killings carried out during the Condor operation. Condor was set up among a number of South American dictatorships, including Chile, in the 70s and 80s to persecute and wipe out the opposition. Judge Guzman said: “I had no difficulty taking this decision once I had examined all the testimonies and elements in the case as well as the perceptions deriving from them… it was very easy. The difficult part was, of course, to examine and analyse everything.”

The judge said Pinochet was fit to stand trial: “General Pinochet is fit to stand trial in all its different phases including the declarations that form part of the investigation and those face to face with witnesses”. He added that “one of the elements taken into consideration” to indict the former general was the interview he had given to a Miami TV channel in November 2003. Until now doctors have cited mental health problems to declare Pinochet “unfit” to stand trial.

Yesterday the former general’s lawyer gave the following reason for lodging an appeal against the decision: “We’re going to file an appeal right away, because we believe that the decision is a disgraceful abuse and because it is a violation of human rights, claimed so often in this country, and because they want to put a person, who is not in a position to defend himself, on trail.”

This is the second time the 89-year-old Pinochet has been indicted. In 2000 Judge Guzman himself brought charges against him in connection with the “Caravan of Death” but the case had to be dropped in 2001 as a result of the report by two of the three psychiatric experts and neurologists who examined the former leader. Nevertheless, Pinochet is now facing charges in another case in connection with the death of the army chief Carlos Prats and his wife. Not long ago Judge Alejandro Solis decided to strip Pinochet of his immunity and indict him; the Appeal Court in Santiago later upheld the decision.

The multi-million accounts he has with the Riggs Banks are also under investigation. In Spain Judge Baltasar Garzon brought charges against him “in connection with the illegal acquisition of wealth, genocide and state terrorism”.



The Crimes of Augusto Pinochet



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Arundhati Roy: The 2004 Sydney Peace Prize lecture

The 2004 Sydney Peace Prize lecture delivered by Arundhati Roy, at the Seymour Theatre Centre, University of Sydney.

Peace & The New Corporate Liberation Theology

It's official now. The Sydney Peace Foundation is neck deep in the business of gambling and calculated risk. Last year, very courageously, it chose Dr Hanan Ashrawi of Palestine for the Sydney Peace Prize. And, as if that were not enough, this year - of all the people in the world - it goes and chooses me!

However I'd like to make a complaint. My sources inform me that Dr Ashrawi had a picket all to herself. This is discriminatory. I demand equal treatment for all Peace Prizees. May I formally request the Foundation to organize a picket against me after the lecture? From what I've heard, it shouldn't be hard to organize. If this is insufficient notice, then tomorrow will suit me just as well.

When this year's Sydney Peace Prize was announced, I was subjected to some pretty arch remarks from those who k…

Thirst for blood and oil

There is a war going on in the Middle East; one in Iraq and the other in Lebanon. It is a war against innocent civilian population, played out by faceless enemies of humanity. Is it only a war in the name of religion, gods, and land? It is also a war in the name of black gold – OIL!

The United States and Britain are only too happy to occupy Iraq and see various parts of it blow up. Iraq's sin is that it has a lot of Oil. But, then, Iraqis are not enough educated and sophisticated people to understand that no one really cares about whether it is Shia oil or Sunni oil. It is a crying shame that Iraqis kill each other in the name of the two factions of Islam – again their only reason for killing is to set the supremacy – and to gain power. Saddam knew too well that Oil was more powerful than anything else in today's world. And Oil is the very reason why he was toppled and put behind bars. It wasn't Saddam's Human Rights violations that the Western governments were too con…